hypnosis, information, hypnotherapy, NLP, community, Scott Sandland, learn, Neuro Linguistic Programming, hypnotist, free
the Free Hypnosis Social Network
We're sorry, but this discussion has just been closed to further replies.
Tags:
Susan French said:I think the piece of the puzzle that's missing is that we only have your opinion that this person is "throwing a tantrum" or that the person is simply stating an opinion that's different from yours. It sounds to me more like a disagreement over a point rather than whether or not this person needs to "change," "agree with your assessment," "has pathology" or is even being socially inappropriate. Or could this simply be a case of "can we agree to disagree?"
Susan,
It's basically a coincidence that I disagree with this guy. I'm in favor of sex equality; he would say he is, but he has hot-buttons. But I really tell everyone I know who has a rant/apologize cycle the same thing: get it taken care of. Even when their rants are coming from a place that I agree with.
It's sequential incongruity. The cause is seen in the structure of a rant: the person who is carrying around bad stuff cycles on it in the background, getting progressively angrier, until they've built up this charge and something triggers it. Then they explode! -- Finally, coming down, they look at the same thing that triggered it, and since they're not carrying around that anger (at the moment) it doesn't make them so angry. And they look at the potential damage they've done their relationships, and feel bad about it.
Well, it's a better process than those who abuse and then feel good about it. I'm not aware of any way for those guys to draw themselves out of the spiral.
But, to address your "agree to differ" point -- I'm not interested in creating taboo topics in my life. I have good friends who are radical feminists who I often disagree with, and I have friends who are die-hard conservatives who I often disagree with. And we can talk politics because we keep an even keel.
Dennis,
Reading between the lines, I think you raise an interesting point about him being a hypnotist and having greater insight into the (temporary) discomforts of the process. I don't know; that could be. But isn't it a priority for hypnotists to undergo the therapeutic process themselves, and be relatively clear of emotional turmoil?
Your post reminds me of an account I read of an American Indian birth that went badly. During colonial times. The father couldn't stand the pain his young wife was going through, and so he went off into the bushes and killed himself. Which, of course, did his wife no good at all.
Aren't we obliged to work out our own stuff so that, unlike Bill Clinton, we don't feel our clients' pain? Isn't that the last thing we want to do, to put ourselves in a state where we can't reach people?
I don't know -- I'm just discouraged.
Kathleen,
Yes, I'm familiar with that process and that site. Good stuff, but not effective for everyone. (There's a step that some people can't follow.) Thanks for the reminder.
Conrad.
© 2009 Created by Scott Sandland, C.Ht. Scott is not responsible for the information or opinions shared on HypnoThoughts or the actions of its members.